WATER AND ITS MANY ISSUES.
METHODS AND CROSS-CUTTING ANALYSIS (WP4, 3/3)

22^nd February – 6^th March 2021
In Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam

The first goal of the Annual ASEAN Water Platform (AWP) is to build capacity in research into water natural resource management (WNRM) within the partner countries’ institutions, by means of gathering researchers from different backgrounds for multidisciplinary methodological approaches related to the analysis of WNRM sector.

The second objective is to disseminate knowledge on WNRM and enhance collaboration between the participants. The platform must be able to increase the research collaboration between participants and to set the basis future long-term partnership between the representatives of different institutions in EU and in ASEAN. Then, the institutions partners must be able to set up and run projects on a bigger international scale.

In order to achieve those goals, AWP relies on the following working principles:

• Transfer of methodological tools;
• Multidisciplinary approaches (social sciences, sciences);
• Good balance between theories and practical work;
• Interactivity among participants;
• Disseminate knowledge;
• Build a collaborative network (academic and non-academic);Intercultural exchanges.

The training will gather more than 100 participants from different countries and backgrounds. AWP is the only training within Wanasea project that is open to participants from outside the consortium, mainly from Vietnam, Laos and Myanmar, thanks to co-funding sources from AUF, IRD, AFD and University of Nantes.

The AWP was initially planned to be held in Chiang Mai University in July 2020 and therefore, the project team had worked together in February 2020 in Chiang Mai discussing logistic and academic issues. Details are available in the Meeting Minutes below (available for download). However, due to the Covid 19 restrictions, it will be organised in parallel in three member countries: Cambodia (Phnom Penh), Thailand (Chiang Mai) and Vietnam (Can Tho) from 22^nd Feb – 6^th Mar 2021.

The general programme (updating) of this unique AWP, workshop programmes of AWP Chiang Mai and AWP Can Tho as well as related application forms are available for download below (Materials for download).

This year, participants will also have a chance to attend the Innovative Research Competition. The Grant award for the winner of each country is 1.000 EUR. The Term of Reference and Application of this competition is available for download too.

Follow us on Facebook or this website for more updates.

Videos of previous trainings are available at the project’s official Youtube channel.

MATERIALS FOR DOWNLOAD

AWP 2021 – Programme – All countries

P1 – Qualitative methodologies in social science, Ruth Banomyong (TU)

P2 – Sustainability of small-scale fisheries-Community based resource management approach in Cambodia, Vietnam and Bangladesh, Dewan Ahsan (SDU)

P3 – Technology Adoption in Agriculture-Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology, Lionel Richefort (UN)

P4 – Water rersources in the Mekong Delta, Nguyen Hieu Trung (CTU)

P5 – Bio-diversity vs Climate change in the Mekong Delta, Duong Van Ni (CTU)

Mekong project – Collective book

Mekong project – Introduction activities

Mekong Project – Procedures and Outcomes

AWP2021 Report

AWP 2021 VIDEO

AWP 2021 – Opening and Plenary Session 1: Qualitative methodologies in social sciences, Ruth Banomyong (Thammasat University)

AWP 2021 – Plenary Session 2: Sustainability of small-scale fisheries: Community based resource management approach in Cambodia, Vietnam and Bangladesh, Dewan Ahsan (SDU) & Plenary Session 3 – Technology Adoption in Agriculture: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology,  Lionel Richefort (University of Nantes)

AWP 2021 – Plenary Session 4: Water rersources in the Mekong Delta – Nguyen Hieu Trung (Can Tho University) & Plenary Session 5: Bio-diversity vs Climate change in the Mekong Delta Duong Van Ni (Can Tho University)

AWP 2021 – Restitution of Inequalities and Environmental Changes Nexus Project – Huynh Thi Phuong Linh (IRD), Stéphane Lagrée (University of Nantes) (including a video introduction of ETIS project by CREED)

AWP 2021 – Innovative Research Competition –  results announcement and speeches from winners

AWP 2021 – Workshop Restitution

Call for contribution to a collective book on:

“Inequalities and environmental changes in the Mekong River Basin”

Co-editors Alexis Drogoul¹, Etienne Espagne², Linh Huynh Thi Phuong³, Stéphane Lagrée⁴

AFD Editions

Rising inequalities and accelerating environmental changes are two of the most significant challenges of the twenty-first century. But how do they relate to each other? Do they have common drivers? As stated in Hamman et al (2018), most research is one-directional, i.e. focusing on the specific effects of social inequalities on the environment (Cushing et al., 2015) or vice-versa (De Laubier Longuet, 2019), and fails to take into account a more complex understanding of how inequality and the state of the environment interact with each other.

Throughout South-East Asia, and especially in the least advanced countries, socio-economic inequalities, relating to income, employment, education, access to land, as well as demographic differences, such as age or gender, are more and more associated with unequal exposure to environmental risk factors (Bangalore et al., 2016). These factors can represent direct threats to people’s lives (landslides, flooding, etc.), or contribute, in an indirect way, to the degradation of agricultural land, propagation of diseases, or, more widely, health issues (air pollution, etc.) (Narloch and Bangalore, 2018). They most often put already disadvantaged people at significantly higher risk regarding environmental effects. Environmental risk factors are not only consequences of global climate changes. They are also (and, until now, most often) consequences of the growing pressures of human societies on their ecosystems. As shown in Inghals et al. (2018), the Mekong region has been radically transformed in the last ten years by the pace and scale of large-scale land acquisitions through foreign and domestic investments, leading to growing inequalities, rural unrest, and a process of simplification and commodification increasingly replacing traditional and natural systems.

In an attempt to gather evidences and works on this topic, we call for contributions to a collective book. We specifically look for manuscripts that illustrate the inequality – environmental nexus in the region (Mekong/Southeast Asia covering one the five countries) as a whole or in one/some of the following five countries: Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. The research should cover one or several environmental elements, including land, water, air, agriculture, climate, ecosystem, biodiversity, forest, mining, in relation to one or various dimensions of inequality, including but not limited to economic (eg. Access to various needs for life), social (eg. Identity, class), cultural (eg. Perspective, belief), political (eg. Participation), spatial (eg. Geography), environment (eg. Environmental Justice) and knowledge (eg. information, education) inequalities. Among others, we specifically put priority on researches that include comparative elements: e.g., comparisons before and after social or environmental changes, or between social groups, communities, places or countries.

This book comes as a by-product of an ongoing systematic review of the inequality-environmental changes nexus in the Mekong region, which will propose, through an exhaustive and qualified search in both the scientific and grey literatures, and critical appraisal in assessing the quality of the collected documents. A synthesis of this systematic review will appear in the book, together with an operational conclusion relative to the state of the current knowledge. One of the main aims of this call for contributions is to illustrate the complexity of the nexus with different case studies, and also propose the broadest possible coverage in terms of geographical and thematic scopes. We therefore reserve the possibility to suggest narrowing or enlarging, when necessary, the scope of the proposals.

Timeline:

• 29^th of February 2020: submission of an extended abstract (three-page minimum) including a description of the research objectives, the methodologies, some preliminary results, and bibliography.
• 13^th of March 2020: notification of acceptance (for both the conference and the chapter)
• 1^st of July 2020: submission of the full chapter
• 3^rd of August 2020: reviews due by the editors and anonymous referees
• 14^th of September 2020: final version of the chapter due
• November 2020: first pdf version of the book

Language: English

Contact persons:

Huynh Thi Phuong Linh, huynhtplinh@gmail.com
Etienne Espagne, espagnee@afd.fr
Stéphane Lagrée, stephane.lagree@univ-nantes.fr, fsp2s@yahoo.fr
Alexis Drogoul: alexis.drogoul@ird.fr

¹ Senior researcher at IRD (French Institute of Research for Development), representative for Vietnam and the Philippines.
² Senior economist at French Development Agency (AFD).
³ Researcher in Social Sciences at IRD.
⁴ International coordinator of the ERASMUS+ WANASEA project: “Strengthen the Production and Management and Outreach Capacities of Research in the field of WAter and NAtural Resources in Southeast Asia”, Nantes University.

From 01/09/2019 to 01/08/2020

Partners:

AFD
WANASEA (Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union)
IRD

Contacts:

Etienne Espagne, Senior Economist, AFD
Stéphane Lagrée, WANASEA, International Coordinator
Alexis Drogoul, Representative of IRD Vietnam – Philippines

This project proposes a systematic analysis of the inequality-environmental change nexus in the Lower Mekong River Basin Region. It aims at building scientific base for policy action as well as identifying uninvestigated research questions. In addition, case studies on relevant fields in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand, representing existing or ongoing researches undertaken by the research network (WANASEA – “Strengthen the Production, Management and Outreach Capacities of Research in the Field of Water and Natural Resources in South-Est Asia” – and IRD) will form a collective book on the topic, together with the systematic review.

Context

Mekong River Basin is crucial for the livelihoods of millions of people of six countries: China, Myanmar, Lao PDR, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. The last four countries are categorized as the Lower Mekong Basin, where two thirds of the population rely on the water resources for subsistence agriculture and fisheries as well as to develop other activities such as transport and tourism. The current anthropogenic causes for environmental degradation in the region include the construction of dams, over-extraction of underground water, pollution from fast developing cities, deforestation, sand extraction, and other activities which create risks to human settlements that were even unheard of ten years ago. More often than not, the impacts of changes vary between groups of people and strongly informed by the social inequalities. Climate change adds to this ongoing environmental degradation by increasing the region’s fragility. For example, one meter of sea-level rise would cause displacement of 7 million inhabitants and flood the homes of more than 14.2 million people in the Mekong Delta.

These major anthropogenic degradations take place in a specific regional and global socio-political context. On the one hand, an accelerated rural transition has been pushed by national governments with the idea of integrating the agricultural sector into the global markets, but also under the pressure of global financial markets searching for returns in the aftermaths of the financial crisis. This rural transition occurs at a pace that fragilizes the economies when they cannot absorb the workforce in excess into the developing industrial or services sectors. In this respect, the Mekong region is a spectacular example of the economic and environmental consequences of the 2008 financial collapse on developing and emerging economies. On the other hand, the countries of the Mekong region are also subjected to the geopolitical shift putting China in the center of a new globalized system. Most of them contribute heavily to this new dynamic, which also severely impacts their environment and inequalities altogether.

For years, international and local organizations, South-East Asian governments as well as bilateral and multilateral development banks have been working to help the Mekong countries mitigate these impacts. However, the lack of a systematic review of existing knowledge in the Mekong makes it difficult to evaluate the impact of specific actions on inequalities and environmental quality. At a moment when governments (both regionally and globally) call for urgent actions, it is time to consider a systemic approach to the environment – inequality nexus in the region.

Objectives

Rising inequalities and accelerating environmental changes are two of the most significant challenges of the twenty-first century. But how do they relate to each other? Do they have common dynamic factors? This research project proposes a specific regional study on how these multidimensional variables of inequality and environmental changes relate and interact with each other. It aims at building scientific base for policy action as well as identifying uninvestigated research questions

Throughout the region, socio-economic inequalities relating to income, employment, education, access to land and other services, as well as demographic differences, such as age, gender, ethnic, and so on are more and more associated with unequal exposure to environmental risk factors. These factors can represent direct threats to people’s lives (landslides, flooding, etc.), or contribute, in an indirect way, to the degradation of agricultural land, propagation of diseases, or, more widely, health issues (air pollution, etc.). They often put already disadvantaged groups at significantly higher risk for environmental effects. Besides, the existing inequality might also contribute to the environmental changes.

Environmental risk factors considered in this project are not solely linked to global climate changes. They are also (and, for the moment, most often) the direct consequences of the growing pressure of human populations and the economic dynamics on the ecosystems. This is particularly visible throughout the Mekong River Basin. The Mekong region has been radically transformed in the last ten years by the pace and scale of large-scale land acquisitions through foreign and domestic investments leading to growing inequalities, rural unrest, and a process of simplification and commodification increasingly replacing traditional and natural systems. The spatial scope of analysis cannot thus remain purely national.

At this stage however, it seems difficult for the local or national decision maker, let alone any regional institution, to take science-based action, as long as no mapping of this scattered knowledge exists, highlighting the diverse quality of the studies, their data sources, their representativeness, the needs for further studies or on the contrary the well-established results. Scoping and systematic reviews, a technic initially coming from the field of medicine, can provide with such a dashboard instrument.

Beyond the project, an objective would be to build a research and capacities research project mobilizing the main academic and non-academic actors in the Southeast Asia region on the research directions which would have emerged from this systematic study.

Method

Scoping the existing knowledge on inequalities and environmental change in the Mekong region

First, we will conduct a preliminary scoping review of the related scientific and grey literature on inequalities and environmental changes in the Lower Mekong region. The resulting literature and data repository created by the review can be of use to researchers and stakeholders interested in the topic. As such, it represents a scientific result and output that can be published in a first scientific paper. It also represents a crucial first step for the two co-implementing partners in the region, who represent a broad network of interdisciplinary researchers in the four countries of the Lower Mekong River basin, and who intend to develop broader research programs based on this scoping review.

Building a dashboard for operational recommendations through a systematic review

Second, we will develop a systematic review. In this second step, quality filters apply, it involves data extraction as well as quantitative analysis. This step requires the work of a full-time post-doc, helped by experts in the different fields represented in the scoping review, and possibly the help of documentalists from the different represented countries. It is thus crucial to be able to gather the expertise of a network of researchers and operational experts already working in the different dimensions of the subject. This is what the WANASEA network, combined with the IRD network in South-East Asia as well as experts from AFD in the region, the Mekong River Commission (MRC), the Compagnie Nationale du Rhône (CNR), the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), and the IUCN will allow to convey. This expert committee will commit to contribute a few days in the year to help the post-doctoral expert taken the right decisions in the filter of data, methods and papers.

Integrating case studies illustrations in the general framework

As a third step of the project, we propose to develop four case-studies which would shed the light on different existing research programs which already studied some aspects of the relation between inequalities and environmental changes along the lower Mekong river basin, from Laos to Vietnam.

Results

The first results of the project will be presented for the international conference on “Climate impacts in South-East Asia” in Quy Nhon (Vietnam) in march 2020. They will lead at least two research papers and a collective book.

The final results will be presented at the ASEAN Water Platform (WANASEA) in the summer 2020 in Chiang Mai University (Thailand).

The project information is also available on AFD website at:
https://www.afd.fr/en/inequalities-and-environmental-changes-lower-mekong-river-basin

Kick Off Meeting

MATERIALS FOR DOWNLOAD

Meeting Minutes

Webinar: Training Session 2

Improvement to the quality of teaching and research in Water and Natural Resources Management (WNRM) cannot be ensured without a) a high commitment of HEIs in the partner countries, b) a high quality of trainers selected from the program countries, c) the ability to provide support (financial and supervision) of young researches, and d) a balance/good fit between the academic skills taught and the skills needed by the wider economic and social environment.

This is the reason why the WANASEA (Water and Natural resources in South-East Asia – www.wanasea.eu) project includes, as part of its activities, 5 training sessions in its 3 years of implementation. The second one focuses on the theme: Project design: writing a scientific proposal. It is co-organized by the Center for Research and Expertise on Education and Development (CREED, France) and Thammasat University (Bangkok, Thailand).

Objective

The main objective of this second training session is to improve the quality of project proposals formulated by WANASEA’s Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the field of WNRM. More specifically, we will focus on the two complementary sides of the project design: its scientific side and its administrative side. Articulation of ideas and description of essential steps of a scientific project will be taught, as well as concrete and practical tools to identify and answer to a call for proposal.

Target groups

Both academic and administrative staff, who are or plan to be involved in scientific activities related to WNRW, are targeted for training. A clear holistic approach is taken since WNRM issues are clearly connected to their societal environment. In addition, an inclusive approach that combines learning about both the scientific and professional aspects of research and teaching activities makes WANASEA’s training sessions unique. Moreover, the training sessions are designed to address HEI’s needs and promote collaboration and institutional commitments among its staff.

Criteria of selection

Trainees should be young professionals (under 40), who can communicate well in the English language and who demonstrate a strong interest for developing research and teaching innovation. Their profiles should be complementary enough so that as a whole, they will constitute a team of researchers and staff who are able to boost research activities and quality of teaching. We encourage WANASEA’s partners to carefully select the trainees in order to meet the above mentioned objectives.

Topic: Project design: writing a scientific proposal

This second training session aims to develop the writing skills of Wanasea’s participants and to identify the conditions for an HEI to set up some administrative support for researchers to be able to implement their project. In this session, we will focus on a major step in a research project: its formulation and design. The subject will be addressed through a very practical and concrete approach, based on the use of examples of calls for proposal, accessible by trainees.

The following questions will be addressed:

• How to identify the right call for proposal for your project;
• How to compare funding program; how to choose the more suitable one for your objectives;
• How to make sure that your project is relevant and consistent with the call; how to read a call and understand the prerequisites;
• The different stages of the project design;
• How to organize your work in order to succeed;
• How an institution can support its researchers.

The session will teach trainees to write a research proposal based on their scientific question. They will learn how to compel to the rules of funding agencies by designing a well-structured proposal, consistent with the scientific basis of their project. Concrete and practical tools will be used in order to make sure that trainees will be able to use what they’ve been taught in their professional activities. The course material is well suited for anyone interested in moving forward from their initial scientific question to the implementation of their project.

Methodology

• Pre-course: pre-assessment will be sent to participants to determine their existing knowledge, skills and interests; articles will be sent, that must be read in preparation.
• The training session will last 4 to 5 days and is designed to train approximately 20 people.
• The learning process is founded upon concrete and tangible activities related to trainees’ concerns. Methods, techniques and exercises will be based on ideas, case studies, programs and/or projects developed by the trainees themselves, resulting in clear improvement of the latter. For this reason, substantial (but reasonable) preparatory work will be asked to the trainees, 2 to 3 weeks before the training.
• For the training session, 4 or 5 trainers will be mobilized into dynamic working groups. We expect a high level commitment of the trainers and trainees attending seminars and transparency of the selection process.

Calendar and milestones

• From 4^th to 24^th February: call for applications open
• 25^th February: Wanasea’s members send to TU/CREED up to 5 applications
• 1^st March: selection of the trainees and beginning of the pre-class activities
• 19^th March: Introductory webinar
• 25-30 March: Training session in TU, Bangkok

Planning (subject to modifications until then)

Mon. 25 March (Morn.)

• Introduction of the topic “Project design: how to write a scientific proposal”
• The different kind of funding agencies and opportunities for SEA researchers and institutions
• Feedback from trainees on their experience in project design

Mon. 25 March (Aft.)

• Reading a call for proposal: the structuration of a project
• Presentation by trainees of their research questions (prepared before the training session – potentially resulting from Wanasea’s first training session)
• Formation of 4 or 5 work groups

Tue. 26 March (Morn.)

• Practical tools and recommendations
• Presentation of the methodology to go from the research question to the formulation of objectives and expected results
• Work groups: formulation of the project objectives and expected results

Tue. 26 March (Aft.)

• Different tools to design a project
• Presentations by IFS staff (tbc)
• Project design from the point of view of funding agencies; the evaluation process

Wed. 27 March (Morn.)

• Presentation of the methodology to work on the activities
• Work groups: formulation of activities

Wed. 27 March (Aft.)

• Field Trip

Thu. 28 March (Morn.)

• Definition of hypothesis and risks
• Indicators
• Monitoring and evaluation

Thu. 28 March (Aft.)

• Presentation JEAI program (IRD) 15h
• Presentation of the methodology to work on the definition of indicators and hypothesis
• Work groups: Formulation of indicators and hypothesis; preparation of final presentation

Fri. 29 March (Morn.)

• Presentation by Euraxess staff (tbc)
• Other concrete opportunities (tbc)
• Work groups: preparation of final presentation)

Fri. 29 March (Aft.)

• Presentation (30’), by each group, of their research project: Objectives, expected results, activities, indicators, hypothesis.
• Discussion: ideas for going further (from the proposal to the implementation…)
• Closing ceremony

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FOR IMPACT: IFS WANASEA PARTNERSHIP

Webinar : Training Session 2

Project design (WP2)

MATERIALS FOR DOWNLOAD

TDR Training session at Thammasat University

Meeting Minutes: Training Session at Thammasat University

Project design: writing a scientific proposal

Reading a call for proposal: the structuration of a project

Science & Innovation for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Reading a call for proposal (Questions to ask before starting)

Understanding Assumptions and Risks in a Project Proposal

Tips for effective writing

IRD’s << JEAI >> Call for proposals

SWOT Analysis

Improve management of the destruction of mangrove ecosystem for sustainable development in Southern Vietnam

Call for proposals – EuropeAID (Andy Ramorasata)

Call for proposals (François Trémège)

CV: Andy Ramorasata

CV: TREMEGE François

CV: Francesco Obino